|
||||||
|
|
Principles of the Master CyclistTopic: Corporate Strategy
Reprint 4525; Winter 2004, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 20–24
The full text of this article is available free to all site visitors, compliments of IBM, as part of our ongoing Business Insight series. Jointly produced by MIT Sloan Management Review and The Wall Street Journal, Business Insight offers fresh thinking on crucial management issues supplemented by the deep knowledge of related, classic SMR articles, of which this is one. Read the Business Insight article to which it relates and other SMR classics on the topic, all free full text.
Part of the Managing in Tough Times collection.
Despite studies indicating the contrary, many academics and practitioners assert that the business cycle can't be predicted and therefore can't be managed. However, managers who draw upon forecasting models, closely follow leading economic indicators and manage their business cycle proactively are likely to emerge from tough economic times intact, says the author. To this end, the “master cyclist” project has evaluated companies' market literacy, forecasting capabilities and use of macroeconomic strategy. From the evaluation, it developed a set of managerial principles, defining how a market-literate management team would approach short-run functional decisions regarding inventory, production, marketing and pricing as well as more strategic choices regarding capital expansion, acquisitions and divestitures. According to the author, explicitly cycle-savvy companies like Johnson & Johnson, Southwest Airlines, DuPont and Duke Power weathered rough economic times well, while companies like Cisco Systems, which rejected the use of macroeconomic forecasting, was caught during the recent recession with crippling levels of product and supply-chain inventories. It follows then, according to the author, that strategic, tactical and functional decisions are better informed by intelligent speculations about the business cycle. As economic-forecasting indicators and techniques continue to improve, so should our understanding of both the business cycle and the principles associated with effectively managing it. is associate professor of economics and public policy at the University of California, Irvine’s Graduate School of Management. He can be reached at peternav@uci.edu.
Academic pricing and volume discount information
|
|